Late last year, our “The State of IJs” series on the CMSCG Blog revealed a clear pattern across the Immediate Jeopardy citations we analyzed: many of the most serious survey findings were rooted in breakdowns within core accident‑prevention and supervision systems. Whether the issue involved lapses in resident monitoring, unaddressed environmental hazards, or failures to implement and follow care‑planned interventions, the underlying vulnerabilities pointed repeatedly to the regulatory expectations captured under F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices.

Those IJ cases underscored how quickly a gap in risk assessment, communication, or environmental safety can escalate into resident harm and how frequently surveyors identify these failures as systemic rather than isolated. The trends we saw late last year make it clear that F689 remains one of the most operationally challenging and heavily scrutinized regulations in long‑term care – and unfortunately result in some of the worst outcomes for our residents.
That’s why our next Ftag of the Week series (which could be an Ftag of the Year for as information packed as this regulation is) focuses on F689. Understanding how surveyors interpret this requirement, where facilities most often fall short, and how these issues align with the IJ patterns we documented are essential for strengthening accident‑prevention systems. This series breaks down the regulatory expectations, the common pitfalls, and the practical steps providers can take to reduce risk and improve resident safety.
Let’s jump in.
F689 – Regulatory Requirements
There’s only two lines of regulation, but the associated Interpretive Guidance (IG) in State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP is plentiful. Per F689:
- The facility must ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible
- The facility must ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents
Those are two short (but not sweet) and very wide-reaching requirements.
Definitions
“Accident” – An accident, per Appendix PP, refers to an unexpected or unintentional incident which result, or may result, in injury or illness to a resident. What’s excluded from this definition? “Accident” does not include harm which is a direct consequence of treatment or care that is provided in accordance with professional standards of practice. An example provided includes side effects or an adverse reaction to a drug.

“Avoidable Accident” – An avoidable accident is one which occurs due to failure of the facility’s part to reduce risk. If the facility fails to take certain actions, which ultimately results in an accident, then the accident would be considered “avoidable.”
Avoidable accidents occur due to the facility’s failure to do any of the following:
- Identify potential environmental hazards
- Assess each resident’s risk of an accident – including the need for supervision and/or assistive devices
- Evaluate/analyze identified hazards/risks and eliminate them – if possible. If it is not possible to eliminate the risk, then the facility must identify and implement measures which reduce risk to the extent possible.
- Implement interventions which are consistent with the resident’s needs, goals, plan of care and current professional standards of practice – including adequate supervision and/or assistive devices – to eliminate or reduce the risk of an accident
- Monitor the effectiveness of the implemented interventions and modify the plan of care as needed, in accordance with professional standards of practice
There’s also a definition for unavoidable accidents. It’s basically the same information just reviewed for the avoidable accidents definition, but indicates that an unavoidable accident is once where, despite the facility developing and implementing a comprehensive system to avoid accidents, one occurred.
“Environment” – The environment is any area of the facility that is accessible to residents or frequented by residents. The environment encompasses areas such as resident rooms, bathrooms and common areas such as hallways, dining/common areas, therapy rooms, lobbies, outdoor patios or activities.
“Risk” – Risk refers to any facility characteristic, resident characteristic or external factor which influences the likelihood of an accident.
There’s more definitions which we will review in follow-up posts to this CMSCG Blog series as we look at common concerns related to accidents, such as falls, inadequate monitoring/ supervision, and other hazards which could result in an accident.